Corporation for Public Broadcasting

401 9th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
U.S.A.
Telephone: (202) 879-9600
Toll Free: (800) 272-2190
Fax: (202) 879-9700
Web site: http://www.cpb.org

Private Company
Founded: 1967
Employees: 100
Operating Revenues: $480.4 million (2005)
NAIC: 513120 Television Broadcasting

HISTORIC BEGINNINGS, 1960–71

POLITICS VS. PROGRAMMING

SLOWED PROGRESS

AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE

NEW MILLENNIUM, NEW CHALLENGES

FURTHER READING

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) distributes government money to public television and radio stations and to organizations that create programming for them. While nearly all of its funding comes from Congress, it is not a government agency. Clear guidelines are in place to keep the CPB staff separate from any programming decisions, leaving the television and radio stations free to initiate and produce programs suitable for their local audiences. Although partisan debates about the appropriateness of government money to support broadcasting have fueled criticism, CPB’s role has always been to fund and support high standards of excellence in educational, informational, and cultural programming.

HISTORIC BEGINNINGS, 1960–71

In the 1960s, during a period of intense scrutiny and criticism of television, a report by the Carnegie Commission outlined measures to improve the quality of television by increasing the quantity of educational programming. The report recommended that funding for public television be increased and that an organization be formed to funnel funding to public broadcasting stations. Initially, this funding was to come from a tax on television sets like that used in Great Britain. Partly because of opposition from television manufacturers, the funding source was changed to congressional appropriations.

A large number of public radio and television stations already existed. The earliest had been founded by universities around 1917. The first radio station run by a nonprofit community group was started in Berkeley, California, in 1949 by the Pacifica Foundation. The first noncommercial television station began broadcasting in Houston in 1953. In 1962 the federal government began helping to fund educational television through the Educational Television Facilities Act.

The CPB was founded by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 with the support of President Lyndon Johnson and most of Congress. The act set up the CPB as a government-sponsored corporation whose funding came through the Department of Housing, Education, and Welfare through the Office of Education. The CPB was allowed to make its funding requests directly to Congress. Because it was not set up as an independent agency or given long-term financing, the CPB was required to continually approach Congress for funding approvals, an arrangement that has influenced much of its history.

Under the terms of the Public Broadcasting Act, the CPB set up a 15-member board of directors that was appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate. This board could not have more than eight members from the same political party as the president, and its members were forbidden from engaging in political activity. With the sponsorship of President Johnson, the CPB was highly centralized under its first president, John Macy, and first chairman, Frank Pace, and it enjoyed a great deal of autonomy in decision making.

As part of its mandate to create an interconnected system of broadcast stations and to distribute and sponsor programming, the CPB quickly set up two further organizations: the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), established in 1969 to create and distribute television programming, and National Public Radio (NPR), created in 1970 to handle radio news and features. While CPB set up PBS and NPR, they were never its subsidiaries. The CPB received money from Congress and distributed it to PBS and NPR, as well as to independent producers who created programming for public broadcast stations. Many of the programs most commonly associated with public television, including Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood and Sesame Street, appeared between 1968 and 1970.

The CPB’s vulnerability to political pressures became apparent after Richard Nixon was elected president in 1968. By 1971 the Nixon administration was in conflict with the CPB over controversial programming, perceiving anti-administration bias in such programs as Washington Week in Review, Bill Moyers, and The Great American Dream Machine. The documentary Banks and the Poor, which alleged that many major banks discriminated against poor customers, also alienated members of Congress by displaying a long list of the names of members of the House and Senate who had ties to the banking industry.

POLITICS VS. PROGRAMMING

Soon public broadcasting was being denounced by Vice President Spiro Agnew, local stations were being encouraged to be more autonomous, and Nixon vetoed the CPB’s appropriations bill for 1973. CPB bowed to pressure from the administration, agreeing to restructure itself and its dealings with other parts of the public television system.

A “partnership agreement” established between CPB and PBS removed the Corporation from many programming decisions it had formerly made, giving these powers to PBS and individual stations. CPB was left to finance technical operations by means of a contract with PBS. CPB, in turn, took over from PBS the right to review controversial programs to make certain they were balanced and fair. Further, the share of its funding CPB gave as unrestricted grants to public broadcasting stations rose to 50 percent; meaning less power for CPB and more for local stations. CPB was rewarded for its capitulation to political pressure with an increase and stabilization of its funding, but had less control over what was done with this money. The Corporation’s appropriation rose from $23 million for 1971, to $35 million for 1972 and 1973, and to $47.5 million for 1974.

As a result of these changes, CPB President John Macy resigned, as did many of his top aides. The changes also led to growing friction between the Corporation and PBS. Over the next few years, CPB was criticized by members of Congress, and by some of its own supporters, for not hiring enough minorities to meet the requirements of civil rights legislation. Of 29 managerial positions in 1975, only two were held by minorities. President Gerald Ford largely ignored the CPB during his two-year term, while Congress raised CPB appropriations to $103 million for 1977 (appropriations were usually allocated two years in advance).

COMPANY PERSPECTIVES

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a private, nonprofit corporation created by Congress in 1967, is the steward of the federal government’s investment in public broadcasting. It helps support the operations of more than 1,000 locally owned and operated public television and radio stations nationwide, and is the largest single source of funding for research, technology, and program development for public radio, television, and related on-line services.

The CPB had an easier time during the Carter administration than during the Nixon and Ford administrations. The Public Telecommunications Financing Act of 1978 returned some of the CPB’s autonomy, eliminating the Office of Telecommunications Policy, which had overseen many aspects of the CPB, and setting up a separate account for the Corporation within the U.S. Treasury. As another result of the act, CPB gave its grants for the production of programs directly to the producers. To do this, CPB created the Program Fund, which defined the criteria for winning such grants and made the awards. Finally, the act opened the Corporation’s board meetings to the public and mandated that CPB annually submit a plan to Congress laying out its objectives for the next five years.

In 1978 President Jimmy Carter tried to win $1 billion over a five-year period for CPB, but the plan met with opposition in Congress, partly because many in Congress felt the Corporation’s mission was still confused, and also because it had a poor record of hiring minorities and women.

In 1979 the Carnegie Commission released another report on public television. This time the commission urged that Congress spend $1 billion a year on public television, and also recommended that another organization be created to take the place of CPB. The report was critical of CPB, claiming it was partly responsible for creating an unwieldy bureaucracy that wasted money that might have otherwise gone to programming. With Congress unwilling to pass President Carter’s far more modest budget, the Carnegie recommendations went nowhere.

Nevertheless, CPB continued to fund the expansion of the public broadcasting network. In 1979, for example, it played a key role in financing the linking of 192 public radio stations to a satellite. This allowed NPR to distribute its programming via satellite instead of via telephone or audiotapes that had to be mailed to stations. Approximately 20 percent of public radio programming was produced nationally, and could be distributed more quickly and with better audio quality.

SLOWED PROGRESS

With the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, the U.S. government entered a period of budget cutbacks. The 1983 appropriation for CPB was reduced to $137 million from $172 million, reversing a six-year trend of budget increases. The Corporation was forced to make layoffs and shrank its managerial force from 134 in 1982, to 102 in 1983, and to 92 in 1984.

Meanwhile Congress cut the CPB board from 15 members to ten, and required that two of the board members come from public television and radio stations. Congress also mandated that 25 percent of the CPB budget go to the Program Fund and instructed the Corporation to begin finding other sources of funding. Ten public television stations were allowed to try limited commercial advertising to help pay their bills.

In 1983, with NPR facing a $9.1 million debt, Congress charged the CPB with putting the organization on a sound financial footing. Negotiations over a bailout loan were tense, as the two organizations vied for control of NPR’s primary asset, its equipment. Finally, in late July, the Corporation gave NPR a $500,000 advance to meet its payroll. Further loans followed, with the proviso that ownership of NPR’s equipment be shifted to a group of independent trustees to prevent their potential seizure by creditors. NPR also agreed to cut costs, raise the fee it charged member stations, and increase contributions from listeners.

KEY DATES

1967:

The Public Broadcasting Act leads to theformation of the Corporation for PublicBroadcasting (CPB).

1969:

CPB sets up the Public Broadcasting Service(PBS) for television programming.

1970:

National Public Radio (NPR) is establishedby CPB.

1973:

CPB is restructured to appease PresidentNixon.

1978:

The Public Telecommunications FinancingAct, approved during the Carter administration, renews CPB’s autonomy.

1979:

CPB finances the link between public radiostations and satellites.

1983:

Congressional appropriations are reduced forthe first time in six years.

1990:

CPB-financed Independent ProductionService gives $3 million for minorityprogramming.

1994:

Future congressional funding of CPB isquestioned.

1997:

Viewer and listener support save CPB fromtermination.

1998:

Congress approves transition from analog todigital technology.

2001:

ExxonMobil Corporation ends 32-yearsponsorship of PBS’s Masterpiece Theatre.

2005:

Amid controversy, Congress appropriates$480.4 million to CPB.

2007:

Congress approves $400 million appropriationto CPB.

President Reagan’s CPB board appointments were often controversial. In 1984 he chose the former head of the organization Women for Reagan-Bush, Sonia Landau, to replace Sharon Rockefeller, who had been appointed by President Carter, as chair. Rockefeller remained on the CPB board, however, and she and Landau quickly engaged in a heated public debate, with Rockefeller and some other directors charging that Reagan appointees had politicized the CPB. Edward J. Pfister, president of the Corporation during Carter’s term, resigned from the board after it voted to cancel a trip he was to make to Moscow to investigate the suitability of some Soviet television programs for American broadcasting. He, Rockefeller, and others alleged the trip was canceled for political reasons, while the Landau faction said it was canceled to avoid wasting taxpayer money.

When Landau’s term expired in 1986, Reagan reap-pointed her, but the Senate declined to act and William Lee Hanley, Jr., an oil company executive, was eventually elected chair. At about the same time, Martin Rubenstein became the second CPB president in two years to resign over policy differences with the Corporation’s board. In 1987 Congress ordered CPB and PBS to settle their differences. The two organizations reached a compromise the following year, in which CPB took responsibility for new programs and authority for the Independent Television Service and the Minority Initiatives production group, both of which had been created by Congress the previous year. CPB agreed to split its remaining programming money with PBS. The agreement was an attempt to streamline public broadcasting, allocating more money to programming and less to administration.

AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE

The 1990 appropriations bill once again restructured how the CPB allocated its money. The bill ordered the Corporation to form the Independent Production Service and give it a budget of $6 million a year. It also gave $3 million for minority programming, and specified 25 percent of CPB’s interest income go to public radio and the other 75 percent to public television. Finally, the bill ordered CPB to spend no more than $10.2 million on its administration, and in following years to allocate either 4 percent of its budget or the percentage rise in the consumer price index, whichever was greater.

In 1992 Senate conservatives attempted to reduce the CPB budget by nearly $400 million over a three-year period. They contended that the programs shown on public broadcasting reflected a liberal bias and were sometimes obscene. The conservatives were defeated by a vote of 75–22, and a $1.1 billion authorization was voted for 1994 to 1996.

By 1994 the public broadcast community for which CPB provided funding had grown to 629 radio stations and 351 television stations. The Corporation’s allocation for 1995 was $285.6 million. Its administrative costs were $13 million, or 4.5 percent of its budget. It made $143.5 million in community service grants directly to local television stations and $44.6 million in community service grants to radio stations. Grants for national programming for radio and television totaled $67 million, and were the largest single source of financing for public television and radio programs. About 6 percent of its budget, or $17 million, went to general system support, which included training and technological research and development. The CPB and public broadcasting received praise in some quarters because of the educational and cultural value of some of its programming, as well as the low level of violence when compared to commercial broadcasting.

Despite Congress’s own criticism of violence in commercial broadcasting, congressional hostility to the CPB had never been higher. Some members of Congress called for the privatization of the CPB, asserting the government should not be supporting broadcasting, and that the diversity of programming the CPB was created to foster was being provided by cable television stations. They argued that public broadcasting could survive on greater private and corporate donations (particularly with more advertising allowed by corporation underwriters), and the marketing of characters from such popular programs as Sesame Street and Barney & Friends.

The mood on the local level was sometimes similar to that of Congress. In 1994 New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani began drawing up plans to sell two of the city’s public broadcast outlets, WNYC-TV and WNYC-FM, prompting CPB to warn him it would seek millions in reimbursement costs if the city went ahead with the sale.

The congressional elections of 1994 turned CPB’s situation from bad to worse as the Republican Party gained control of both the House and the Senate. Attempting to cut federal spending, and objecting to what many saw as liberal or immoral programming, Congress soon directed the Corporation to look for ways to completely replace its federal funding with other sources of revenue. Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan introduced a measure to eliminate the CPB’s funding for 1998.

The CPB, along with public television and radio leaders, began a major grassroots effort against a funding cutoff. CPB President Richard Carlson formed a task force with executives from PBS, NPR, and other organizations to increase public support. PBS stations began airing commercials warning that its programming might disappear if the CPB’s funding were cut off.

The Corporation hired Lehman Brothers Inc., a New York financial firm, to investigate possible sources of new revenue. Lehman looked at ways to cut costs throughout public broadcasting, perhaps through limiting funding to one public broadcasting station in each market. It also considered generating revenue by marketing toys from popular public broadcasting programs, selling broadcast spectrum, and increasing the amount of corporate sponsorship. Ultimately, it was determined that no amount of additional funding could replace Congress’s financial support.

In the face of financial troubles and partisan politics, the survival of public broadcasting was inevitably due to overwhelming viewer and listener support. PBS reported a viewership of a record 81 percent of the population in 1995, and when Congress threatened to abolish public broadcasting from the government’s payroll, they were inundated by letters supporting the CPB. As a result, $250 million was committed to CPB for 1999 and $300 million for 2000.

Nevertheless, with a new millennium on the horizon, high-tech challenges and astronomical budgetary constraints were looming. The more versatile digital television technology was developed as a replacement for the standard analog system of broadcasting. Digital technology allowed broadcasters to transmit more than one television program at a time, offering better picture quality and interactive services. It was the new wave of TV viewing and radio listening, and Congress set a deadline of February 2009 for all television stations to broadcast only in digital technology, completely ending analog transmission. For public television this posed another funding problem: more than $1.7 billion would be required to complete the transition of hundreds of PBS affiliates. Beginning in 1998, Congress approved incremental appropriations for the decade-long investment into digital transition.

As plans for growth began to unfold, the old debate over public broadcasting’s partisan leanings again created kinks in the process. In 1999 several public broadcasting affiliates, including the large WGBH in Boston, were accused of trading donor lists with the Democratic National Committee. While the practice was often overlooked in other nonprofit circles, the controversy ignited historic criticism that public programming tilted too far to the left. In response, CPB created new policies to avoid “careless” oversights in donor list trading practices.

NEW MILLENNIUM, NEW CHALLENGES

While CPB recovered from the donor list snag, public television’s progress began to wane as old controversies lingered. When George W. Bush entered the White House in 2001, the country was in a recession with a turbulent stock market. Many of the 349 public TV stations were losing individual pledges and corporate donations, threatening their viability and causing budget cuts and layoffs. Most notably, ExxonMobil Corporation, a longtime contributor to public television’s Masterpiece Theatre (to the tune of $9 million annually), ended its 32-year sponsorship. In addition, many PBS viewers were enticed by programs on cable competitors such as Discovery, National Geographic, and the History Channel. Federal appropriations became more important than ever, and CPB arduously acquired commitments from Congress.

Arguments between public broadcasting supporters and critics continued, however, but the tenor began to change. Funding was not the only issue in question; tampering with content became a new focus. Critics of the Bush administration claimed his conservative views reached into every aspect of government, CPB included. Under scrutiny was one of the primary missions and goals of public broadcasting: to provide objectivity and balance in programming, especially in issues of a controversial nature. In 2005 CPB board Chairman Kenneth Y. Tomlinson was ousted after an investigation by CPB Inspector General Kenneth A. Konz found him guilty of interfering with programming to create a more conservative slant and of using political tests for hiring decisions.

Konz’s report said Tomlinson violated internal ethics regulations by threatening to withhold funds if conservative programming was not increased and by helping develop and promote the Journal Editorial Report, a right-leaning current-events program. Moreover, a November 27, 2005, Washington Post editorial contended that Tomlinson communicated with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove during a search to hire new CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison. Harrison had previously served as a cochair of the Republican National Committee.

Cheryl F. Halpern replaced Tomlinson as CPB chairman, bringing 15 years of public broadcasting service and the hope of returning CPB to its nonpartisan mission and roots. By 2005, there were more than 1,000 public television and radio stations depending on CPB’s support and $480.4 million in appropriations. Congress approved annual funding of $400 million through fiscal 2007.

In the last half of the first decade of the 2000s, the future of public broadcasting looked bright, but some warned its focus should remain clear. Tavis Smiley, host of the Tavis Smiley Show on PBS and Public Radio International, commented on the bipartisan issue to the Washington Post (July 31, 2005): “If the core of our discussion on the future of public broadcasting is about shifting content in one direction or the other on the political spectrum, the medium is doomed to fiscal and intellectual bankruptcy.” Smiley’s hope was to “embrace, grow and reward intelligent and inclusive conversation” about the diverse issues facing the changing nation.

Scott M. Lewis
Updated, Jodi Essey-Stapleton

FURTHER READING

Brennan, Patricia, “The Business of Television; PBS Plans the Shows and Looks for More Money,” Washington Post, September 15, 1996, p. Y06.

Brown, Les, “Carnegie Unit Urges a Billion a Year for Public TV,” New York Times, January 23, 1979, pp. A1, B17.

________, “Carter’s Five-Year $1 Billion Plan for Public Broadcasting Opposed,” New York Times, March 4, 1978, pp. A1, A44.

Fahri, Paul, “Public Broadcast Agency Picks GOP Appointee over Protests; Choice of Patricia Harrison Draws More Bias Complaints,” Washington Post, June 24, 2005, p. C01.

Ferretti, Fred, “Corporation for Public Broadcasting Seeks Funds,” New York Times, February 3, 1970.

Gerard, Jeremy, “Public TV’s Plan: Cut Red Tape, Diversify Shows,” New York Times, November 20, 1989, p. C18.

Gould, Jack, “Major Programing Shake-Up Hits Educational TV,” New York Times, April 9, 1969, p. A1.

________, “Pace and 12 Others Named by President to Public TV Board,” New York Times, February 18, 1968, p. A1.

Labaton, Stephen, Lorne Manly, and Elizabeth Jensen, “Chairman Exerts Pressure on PBS, Alleging Biases,” New York Times, May 2, 2005, p. A1.

Lashley, Marilyn, Public Television, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.

McAvoy, Kim, “Public Broadcasters Go on Offense,” Broadcasting & Cable, December 19, 1994, pp. 48–49.

Molotsky, Irvin, “How Public Broadcasting Survived the Attacks of Conservatives,” New York Times, November 27, 1997, p. E1.

________, “Public Broadcasting Is Airing Its Linen,” New York >Times, August 11, 1985.

Oneal, Michael, and Richard Melcher, “Dead End for Sesame Street?” Business Week, June 19, 1995, pp. 66–68.

Rathbun, Elizabeth, “House Makes CPB Cuts,” Broadcasting & Cable, March 20, 1995, p. 15.

________, “The Selling of Public TV,” Broadcasting & Cable, February 13, 1995, pp. 43–45.

Schwartz, Tony, “Public TV Faces Financial Crisis,” New York Times, November 13, 1980, pp. A1, C34.

“Signals Crossed at the CPB,” Washington Post, November 27, 2005, p. B06.

Smiley, Tavis, “Left? Right? Wrong! The Misguided CPB Debate,” Washington Post, July 31, 2005, p. N06.

Teicher, Stacy A., “Public Broadcasting, Democrats, and ‘the Lists’ Furor over Sharing Donor Lists Threatens New Funding for Public Radio and TV,” Christian Science Monitor, July 21, 1999, p. 1.

Tolchin, Martin, “Public Broadcasting Wins Senate Battle for Federal Money,” New York Times, June 4, 1992, pp. A1– B10.

Corporation for Public Broadcasting

901 E. Street, NW
Washington, D.C., 20004
U.S.A.
(202) 879-9600
Fax: (202) 783-1039

Private Company
Founded: 1967
Operating Revenues: $282.4 million
Employees: 115
SICs: 4833 Television Broadcasting Stations

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributes government money to public television and radio stations and to organizations that create programming for them. While nearly all of its funding comes from Congress, it is not a government agency.

During the 1960s, during a period of intense scrutiny and criticism of television, a report by the Carnegie Commission outlined measures to improve the quality of television by increasing the quantity of educational programming. The report recommended that funding for public television be increased and that an organization be formed to funnel funding to public broadcasting stations. Initially, this funding was to come from a tax on television sets like that used in Great Britain. Partly because of opposition from television manufacturers, the funding source was changed to Congressional appropriations.

A large number of public radio and television stations already existed. The earliest had been founded by universities around 1917. The first radio station run by a nonprofit community group was started in Berkeley, California, in 1949 by the Pacifica Foundation. The first noncommercial television station began broadcasting in Houston in 1953. In 1962 the federal government began helping to fund educational television through the Educational Television Facilities Act.

CPB was founded by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, with the support of President Lyndon Johnson and most of Congress. The Act set up the CPB as a government-sponsored corporation whose funding came through the Department of Housing, Education, and Welfare through the Office of Education. The CPB was allowed to make its funding requests directly to Congress. Because it was not set up as an independent agency or given long-term financing, the CPB was required to continually approach Congress for funding approvals—an arrangement that has influenced much of its history.

Under the terms of the Public Broadcasting Act, the CPB set up a fifteen-member board of directors that was appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate. This board could not have more than eight members from the same political party as the president, and its members were forbidden from engaging in political activity. With the sponsorship of President Johnson, the CPB was highly centralized under its first president, John Macy, and first chairman, Frank Pace, and it enjoyed a great deal of autonomy in decision making.

As part of its mandate to create an interconnected system of broadcast stations and to distribute and sponsor programming, the CPB quickly set up two further organizations: the Public Broadcasting Service, established in 1969 to create and distribute television programming, and National Public Radio, created in 1970 to handle radio news and features. While CPB set up PBS and NPR, they were never its subsidiaries. The CPM received money from Congress and distributed it to PBS and NPR, as well as to independent producers who created programming for public broadcast stations. Many of the programs now most closely associated with public television, including Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood and Sesame Street, appeared between 1968 and 1970.

The CPB’s vulnerability to political pressures became apparent after Richard Nixon was elected president in 1968. By 1971 the Nixon Administration was in conflict with the CPB over controversial programming, perceiving anti-Administration bias in such programs as Washington Week in Review, Bill Moyers, and The Great American Dream Machine. The documentary Banks and the Poor, which alleged that many major banks discriminated against poor customers, also alienated members of Congress by displaying a long list of the names of members of the House and Senate who had ties to the banking industry.

Soon public broadcasting was being denounced by Vice President Spiro Agnew, local stations were being encouraged to be more autonomous, and Nixon vetoed the CPB’s appropriations bill for 1973. CPB bowed to pressure from the administration, agreeing to restructure itself and its dealings with other parts of the public television system.

A “partnership agreement” established between CPB and PBS removed the Corporation from many programming decisions it had formerly made, giving these powers to PBS and individual stations. CPB was left to finance technical operations by means of a contract with PBS. CPB, in turn, took over from PBS the right to review controversial programs to make certain that they were balanced and fair. Further, the share of its funding that CPB gave as unrestricted grants to public broadcasting stations rose to 50 percent. This meant less power for CPB and more for local stations. CPB was rewarded for its capitulation to political pressure with an increase and stabilization of its funding, but had less control over what was done with this money. The Corporation’s appropriation rose from $23 million for 1971, to $35 million for 1972 and 1973, and to $47.5 million for 1974.

As a result of these changes, CPB President John Macy resigned, as did many of his top aides. The changes also led to growing friction between the Corporation and PBS.

Over the next few years, the CPB was criticized by members of Congress, and by some of its own supporters, for not hiring enough minorities to meet the requirements of civil rights legislation. Of 29 managerial positions in 1975, only two were held by minorities. President Gerald Ford largely ignored the CPB during his two-year term, while Congress raised CPB appropriations to $103 million for 1977 (appropriations were usually allocated two years in advance).

The CPB had an easier time during the Carter Administration than during the Nixon and Ford Administrations. The Public Telecommunications Financing Act of 1978 returned some of the CPB’s autonomy, eliminating the Office of Telecommunications Policy, which had overseen many aspects of the CPB, and setting up a separate account for the Corporation within the U.S. Treasury. As another result of the act, the CPB gave its grants for the production of programs directly to the producers of the programs. To do this, the CPB created the Program Fund, which defined the criteria for winning such grants and made the awards. Finally, the act opened the Corporation’s board meetings to the public, and mandated that CPB annually submit a plant to Congress laying out its objectives for the next five years.

In 1978 President Carter tried to win $1 billion over a five-year period for CPB, but the plan met with opposition in Congress, partly because many in Congress felt the Corporation’s mission was still confused, and also because it had a poor record of hiring minorities and women.

In 1979 the Carnegie Commission released another report on public television. This time the Commission urged that Congress spend $1 billion a year on public television—and also recommended that another organization be created to take the place of CPB. The report was critical of CPB, claiming that it was partly responsible for creating an unwieldy bureaucracy that wasted money that might have otherwise gone to programming. With Congress unwilling to pass President Carter’s far more modest budget, the Carnegie recommendations went nowhere.

Nevertheless, CPB continued to fund the expansion of the public broadcasting network. In 1979, for example, it played a key role in financing the linking of 192 public radio stations to a satellite. This allowed National Public Radio to distribute its programming via satellite instead of via telephone or audio tapes that had to be mailed to stations. Approximately 20 percent of public radio programming was produced nationally, and could now be distributed more quickly and with better audio quality.

With the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, the U.S. government entered a period of budget cutbacks. The 1983 appropriation for CPB was quickly reduced to $137 million from $172 million, reversing a six-year trend of increases in CPB’s budget. The Corporation was forced to make layoffs, and shrank its managerial force from 134 in 1982, to 102 in 1983, and to 92 in 1984.

Meanwhile Congress cut the CPB board from 15 members to 10, and required that two of these board members come from public television and radio stations. Congress also mandated that 25 percent of the CPB budget go to the Program Fund and instructed the Corporation to begin finding other sources of funding. Ten public television stations were allowed to try limited commercial advertising to help pay their bills.

In 1983, with National Public Radio facing a $9.1 million debt, Congress charged the CPB with putting the organization on a sound financial footing. Negotiations over a bailout loan were tense, as the two organizations vied for control of NPR’s primary asset, its equipment. Finally, in late July, the Corporation gave NPR a $500,000 advance to meet its payroll. Further loans followed, with the proviso that ownership of NPR’s equipment be shifted to a group of independent trustees to prevent their potential seizure by creditors. NPR also agreed to cut costs, raise the fee it charged member stations, and increase its contributions from listeners.

President Reagan’s CPB board appointments were often controversial. In 1984 he chose the former head of the organization Women for Reagan-Bush, Sonia Landau, to replace Sharon Rockefeller, who had been appointed by President Carter, as chair. Rockefeller remained on the CPB board, however, and she and Landau quickly engaged in a heated public debate, with Rockefeller and some other directors charging that Reagan appointees had politicized the CPB. Edward J. Pfister, president of the Corporation during Carter’s term, resigned from the board after it voted to cancel a trip he was to make to Moscow to investigate the suitability of some Soviet television programs for American broadcasting. He, Rockefeller, and others alleged that the trip was canceled for political reasons, while the Landau faction said it was canceled to avoid wasting taxpayer money. When Landau’s term expired in 1986, Reagan reappointed her, but the Senate declined to act on her nomination, and William Lee Hanley, Jr., an oil company executive, was eventually elected chair. At about the same time, Martin Rubenstein became the second CPB president in two years to resign over policy differences with the Corporation’s board.

In 1987 Congress ordered CPB and PBS to settle their differences. The two organizations reached a compromise the following year in which the Corporation took responsibility for new programs and authority for the Independent Television Service and the Minority Initiatives production group, both of which had been created by Congress the previous year. CPB agreed to split its remaining programming money with PBS. The agreement was an attempt to streamline public broadcasting, allocating more money to programming and less to administration.

The 1990 appropriations bill once again restructured how the CPB allocated its money. The bill ordered the Corporation to form the Independent Production Service and give it a budget of $6 million a year. It also gave $3 million for minority programming, and specified that 25 percent of CPB’s interest income go to public radio and the other 75 percent to public television. Finally, the bill ordered the Corporation to spend no more than $10.2 million on its administration, plus, in following years, either four percent or the percent rise in the Consumer Price Index, whichever was greater.

In 1992 Senate conservatives attempted to reduce the CPB budget by nearly $400 million over a three-year period. They contended that the programs shown on public broadcasting reflected a liberal bias and were sometimes obscene. The conservatives were defeated by a vote of 75-22, and a $1.1 billion authorization was voted for 1994 to 1996.

By 1994 the public broadcast community for which CPB provided funding had grown to 629 radio stations and 351 television stations. The Corporation’s allocation for fiscal 1995 was $285.6 million. Its administrative costs were $13 million, or 4.5 percent of its budget. It made $143.5 million in community service grants directly to local television stations and $44.6 million in community service grants to radio stations. Grants for national programming for radio and television totaled $67 million, and were the largest single source of financing for public television and radio programs. About six percent of its budget, or $17 million, went to general system support, which included training and technological research and development. The CPB and public broadcasting received praise in some quarters because of the educational and cultural value of some of its programming, as well as the low level of violence compared to that of commercial broadcasting.

However, despite Congress’s own criticism of violence in commercial broadcasting, congressional hostility to the CPB had never been higher. Some members of Congress called for the privatization of the CPB, asserting that the government should not be supporting broadcasting, and that the diversity of programming the CPB was created to foster was now being provided by cable television stations. They argued that public broadcasting could survive on greater private and corporate donations (particularly with more advertising allowed by corporation underwriters), and the marketing of characters from popular programs like Sesame Street and Barney & Friends.

The mood on the local level was sometimes similar to that in Congress. In 1994 New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani began drawing up plans to sell two of the city’s public broadcast outlets, WNYC-TV and WNYC-FM, prompting the CPB to warn him that it would seek millions of dollars in reimbursement costs if the city went ahead with the sale.

The Congressional elections of 1994 turned CPB’s situation from bad to worse as the Republican Party gained control of both the House and the Senate. Attempting to cut federal spending—and objecting to what many saw as liberal or immoral programming—Congress soon directed the Corporation to look for ways to completely replace its federal funding with other sources of revenue. Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan introduced a measure to eliminate the CPB’s funding for 1998.

The CPB, along with public television and radio leaders, began a major grass-roots effort against a funding cutoff. CPB president Richard Carlson formed a task force with executives from PBS, NPR, and other organizations to increase public support. PBS stations began airing commercials warning that its programming might disappear if the CPB’s funding were cut off.

The Corporation hired Lehman Brothers Inc., a New York financial firm, to investigate possible sources of new revenue. Lehman looked at ways to cut costs throughout public broadcasting, by methods including limiting funding to one public broadcasting station in each market. It also considered generating revenue by marketing toys from popular public broadcasting programs, selling broadcast spectrum, and increasing the amount of corporate sponsorship. Lehman’s report concluded that all of these means together could not replace federal government funding, leaving the Corporation’s future murky.

Further Reading

Brown, Les, “Carnegie Unit Urges a Billion a Year for Public TV,” New York Times, January 23, 1979, pp. A1, B17.

——, “Carter’s Five-Year $1 Billion Plan for Public Broadcasting Opposed,” New York Times, March 4, 1978, pp. A1, A44.

Ferretti, Fred, “Corporation for Public Broadcasting Seeks Funds,” New York Times, February 3, 1970.

Gerard, Jeremy, “Public TV’s Plan: Cut Red Tape, Diversify Shows, New York Times, November 20, 1989, p. C18.

Gould, Jack, “Major Programing Shake-Up Hits Educational TV,” New York Times, April 9, 1969, p. A1.

——, “Pace and 12 Others Named by President to Public TV Board,” New York Times, February 18, 1968, p. A1.

Lashley, Marilyn, Public Television, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.

McAvoy, Kim, “Public Broadcasters Go on Offense,” Broadcasting & Cable, December 19, 1994, pp. 48-49.

Molotsky, Irvin, “Public Broadcasting Is Airing Its Linen,” New York Times, August 11, 1985.

Oneal, Michael, and Richard Melcher, “Dead End for Sesame Street?,” Business Week, June 19, 1995, pp. 66-68.

Rathbun, Elizabeth, “House Makes CPB Cuts,” Broadcasting & Cable, March 20, 1995, p. 15.

——, “The Selling of Public TV,” Broadcasting & Cable, February 13, 1995, pp. 43-45.

Schwartz, Tony, “Public TV Faces Financial Crisis,” New York Times, November 13, 1980, pp. A1, C34.

Tolchin, Martin, “Public Broadcasting Wins Senate Battle for Federal Money,” New York Times, June 4, 1992, pp. A1-B10.

—Scott M. Lewis

Corporation for Public Broadcasting

Producers Academy Scholarships (All/Scholarship)
Small Station Training Scholarships (Professional Development/Scholarship)

401 9th St. NW
Washington, DC 20004-2129
Ph: (202)879-9600
Free: 800-272-2190
E-mail: [email protected]
URL:http://www.cpb.org

Producers Academy Scholarships (All/Scholarship)

Purpose: To facilitate the development of and ensure universal access to non-commercial high quality programming and telecommunications services. Focus: Broadcasting. Qualif.: Applicants must have an interest in broadcasting. Criteria: Recipients are selected based on the research proposal.

Funds Avail.: No specific amount. Number Awarded: 20. To Apply: Applicants must complete the application form.

Small Station Training Scholarships (Professional Development/Scholarship)

Purpose: To support and extend training beyond a public television station’s normal training capacity; to enable station management and staff to access more training and professional development opportunities than the stations training budget would normally support. Focus: Media. Qualif.: Applicants must be individuals who have an interest in radio or television broadcasting. Criteria: Recipients are selected based on the quality of the training and whether the training is directly connected to the stated individual and station goals, and the likelihood that the training will garner the desired, anticipated and stated outcomes.

Funds Avail.: Maximum amount of $2,000. Number Awarded: 2. To Apply: Applicants must complete the application form and submit 1-2 page proposals. Contact: [email protected].