Irvine v. California 347 U.S. 128 (1954)
IRVINE v. CALIFORNIA 347 U.S. 128 (1954)
California police installed a listening device in a bedroom. Although this action violated fundamental constitutional principles protecting personal security, the Supreme Court held that under wolf v. colorado (1949) the unconstitutionally obtained evidence could be used; the bedroom microphone did not sufficiently "shock the conscience," under rochin v. california (1952), to warrant exclusion.
Herman Schwartz
(1986)
More From encyclopedia.com
Brief for the Petitioners , Brief for the Petitioners
In the Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1963
No. 39
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, PETITIONER,
V.
L. B. SULLIV… V , V, v [Called ‘vee’]. The 22nd LETTER of the Roman ALPHABET as used for English. It originated, along with F, U, W, Y, in the Phoenician consonant sym… Mapp V Ohio , Mapp v Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio
A landmark Supreme Court decision, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961), established the rule… Chichimec , Chichimec •beck, bedeck, check, cheque, Chiang Kai-shek, crosscheck, Czech, deck, dreck, exec, fleck, heck, hitech, keck, lek, neck, peck, Québec, re… Alta California , California (kăl´Ĭfôr´nyə), most populous state in the United States, located in the Far West; bordered by Oregon (N), Nevada and, across the Colorado… Hurtado V. California , Hurtado v. California
An 1884 decision of the Supreme Court, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 4 S. Ct. 111, 28 L. Ed. 232, held that states are n…
About this article
Irvine v. California 347 U.S. 128 (1954)
You Might Also Like
NEARBY TERMS
Irvine v. California 347 U.S. 128 (1954)