Cummins Engine Corporation

500 Jackson Street
P.O. Box 3005
Columbus, Indiana 47202
U.S.A.
(812) 377-5451

Public Company
Incorporated: February 3, 1919
Employees: 19,624
Sales: $2.304 billion
Market Value: $855 million
Stock Index: New York

Cummins Engine Corporation, founded in 1919 by a chauffeur who worked on motors in his employer’s garage, is a leading supplier of diesel engines for trucks and heavy industry. Its worldwide subsidiaries design, manufacture and sell diesel engines, components, and replacement parts. While Cummins does not produce its own trucks, its engines are offered as options by every major U.S. truck manufacturer—even those that manufacture their own diesel engines and compete with Cummins. In addition to trucks, Cummins’ diesel engines are used for drilling rigs, boats, industrial locomotives, compressors, pumps, logging equipment, agricultural equipment, and municipal and school buses. The company that didn’t turn a profit for its first 18 years has presently surpassed $2 billion in total sales.

The company’s founder and the man who made Rudolf Diesel’s engine design practical was Clessie L. Cummins, the chauffeur of a 1909 Packard touring car owned by Will G. Irwin, a rich industrialist and philanthropist in Columbus, Indiana. Cummins was regarded by Irwin as indispensable since he was the only man who could keep the Packard in running condition. When shortly before World War I, he demanded a pay hike to $85 a month, Irwin threatened to fire him. However, the two men reached a compromise. Cummins would accept a salary reduction if the family garage was equipped with tools so that he could do engine repair work. In 1917 Cummins began making wagon hub caps for the Army, while reading news about Germany’s diesel-powered U-boats. Most diesel engines at that time were large and smoky, and entirely impractical for any kind of transportation.

Cummins started working fulltime on diesels in 1919 when he heard that Sears, Roebuck & Co., would buy 3-horsepower farm diesels made on a European patent. He persuaded Irwin to negotiate a contract with Sears and established the Cummins Engine Corporation. The beginning was inauspicious; Sears said the engines were defective, and Irwin had to financially rescue his chauffeur. Neither Irwin nor Cummins was quitting, however. Irwin gave Cummins $10,000 to correct the initial defect, and eventually poured more that $2.5 million into the company.

The problem with diesel engines at that time was that engineers kept adding devices to them to give them more power. Cummins accepted only one common premise, that of “combustion ignition,” or fuel oil in the cylinder bursting into flames to provide power, and systematically disposed of other parts. He initially reduced engine horsepower, but ultimately got his diesel to run faster than other models. For ten years his experimental engines ripped the bottoms out of fishing boats or tore themselves to remnants, but Cummins still would not quit. His breakthrough was what he called “the Sneezer,” a device that discharged every last particle of fuel oil into the cylinder to ensure that no oil was released as smoke. He also created a fuel injector experts described as “simpler than a fountain pen.”

With his diesel at last perfected, he installed it in a Packard and drove the 792 miles from Columbus to New York City on $1.88 of heating oil without refueling. He then exhibited the car in the 1930 New York Automobile Show. When skeptics suggested he had used more fuel than he admitted, Cummins proved them wrong by driving across the country on $9.36 of fuel. He also raced the Packard in the Indianapolis Speedway and finished 13th while establishing a record speed for a diesel-driven car of 80.389 mph.

Cummins’ fuel pump and injector were now regarded as the best in the industry, but truck manufacturers refused to use them and continued to manufacture gas engines, while trying to design their own diesel engine. Irwin came to Cummins’ rescue by having the engines of delivery trucks used by his chain of Purity Stores in California replaced by Cummins’ diesel engines. The truckers liked these new engines, which were powerful, fuel-efficient, and reliable. As these truckers recommended the engine to their colleagues, the business began to flourish.

Cummins, however, was no salesman. So Irwin’s grand-nephew, J. Irwin Miller, a young man with a pronounced taste for Greek and Latin, but without any business training, was appointed as head of the company. Miller was an unlikely manager. He had stuttered as a child, was something of an outcast at school, and knew nothing about engines. But he had expected to inherit some facet of the family business, and he applied himself rigorously to the business at hand.

Miller replaced the chauffeur’s hand tools with production equipment and constructed a fullscale plant. He then neutralized a threatened CIO strike by helping the company form its own union, the Diesel Workers Union, and solicited business during the depression by pointing out to cash-starved truckers that they would save money if they bought only those trucks that offered Cummins engines as options. Miller referred to this strategy, namely, going to the users and not the suppliers, as a “back-door approach.” Fortunately for the young company, the trucking business prospered in the 1930’s due to improved roads and demand for point-to-point deliveries. Diesel engines for large trucks that needed maximum fuel efficiency were more and more in demand. In 1937 the young company turned its first profit. Selling engines to competitors was an uncertain way of doing business, but it worked and it continues to be, however unorthodox, the Cummins approach. Miller, who became an admired scholar and philanthropist, and the first layman president of the National Council of Churches, later acknowledged, “We’re in the business of selling engines to engine makers, which is surely not the smartest way to make a living.”

The company was not just unorthodox in its marketing approach. It contributed five per cent of its profits each year to charity or to Columbus architecture projects, and was a local leader in labor relations and desegregation. Years later, Cummins became one of the first companies in its industry to hire blacks for other than janitorial jobs. Miller’s sense of justice and his scholarly background helped him at times decide against prevailing social attitudes. When asked why Cummins was resisting pressure to diversify, Miller told Forbes,” This may be counter to trends, but we believe that by diversifying you are liable to lose confidence in the value of a good product.”

The company doubled its sales in five years and continued to double sales every five years into the 1960’s. Sales in 1946 hit $20 million; a decade later they reached more than $100 million. Cummins’ best-selling engine was a 2,590-pound diesel for trucks of 13 tons or more. In order to maintain the high demand for Cummins engines, the company had to stay ahead of the competition, which soon included Mack Trucks, Caterpillar, and GM’s Detroit Diesel. In 1952 the company unveiled a turbo-diesel which used exhaust gases to turn a gas turbine supercharger. The device, without raising fuel consumption, increased the horsepower of each Cummins engine by 50%. That year Cummins demonstrated the engine in the Indianapolis Speedway where it malfunctioned. Miller was non-plussed. “We have progressed from failure to failure,” he said, confidently predicting that the turbo-diesel would soon be perfected and marketed, which it was.

Cummins stayed way ahead of its competition in the 1950’s by securing up to 60% of the heavy truck market. Its in-line 6-cylinder engines were renowned for their power and longevity. Cummins distributors, who handled nothing but Cummins engines, were regarded as highly reputable because of their expertise with the single product line. Although it faced competition from Caterpillar and Euclid, Cummins also began selling engines for off-the-road construction. “We’ll build the roads and then we’ll run on them,” said Miller.

However, the heavy truck market appeared to be saturated by 1960. To expand into alternative markets Cummins crafted a new line of V-6 and V-8 engines, based on an “oversquare” gasoline engine design. Since the diameter of the cylinder in oversquare engines is greater than the piston stroke, the engines produce more power at high speeds. Diesel engines had been long-stroke, but Cummins’ engineers found the right combination of fuel and air to inject into the combustion chamber and make their engines workable.

The new engines, the Vim, a V-6 model with 200 horsepower, the Vine, a V-8 with 265 horsepower, and the Val, a V-6 with 120 horsepower, represented the first time Cummins attempted to penetrate the lighter truck market. At that time, 44% of trucks 13 tons and over had diesel engines, but fewer than 1% of the trucks from eight to 13 tons were diesel-powered. With heavier trucks representing just 6% of the market, and the lighter trucks 22%, management concluded that manufacturing smaller engines would raise revenues. But the lighter truck market proved difficult to enter. Gas was cheap and diesel engines, which at that time cost $1,000-$4,000 more than gasoline engines, were seen as economical only if the vehicles were driven approximately 4,000 hours per year.

In the early 1960’s the Cummins Engine Corporation began a slow decline. Sales and profits fluctuated. A new line of engines with more than 300 horsepower, introduced by the company in 1962, failed to gain a dominant market share for more than two years. Management was criticized for being behind in both product development and market share.

Part of the problem was Cummins’ policy of diversification. Beginning in the late 1950’s Cummins started acquiring an interest in companies that produced diesel-related products. By the late 1960’s it had become genuinely diversified, purchasing a ski manufacturer, a bank, and even an Irish cattle feeding outfit. Management had decided to make these acquisitions due to the slow growth of the diesel market. While Cummins’ sales averaged 15% annual growth, the diesel market was projected to expand at half that rate. A number of new diesel competitors, such as GMC Division and Perkins, compounded the problem.

By 1967 Cummins’ share of the crucial heavy-truck market had slipped to less than 45%. Earnings were off 78%. A strong truck market helped sales rebound in 1968, reaching a record of $365 million. Vigorous sales continued over the next few years, but earnings were erratic. Miller’s hand-picked young successor, Henry Schacht, who joined the company after graduating from Harvard Business School and assumed the presidency just two years later, blamed surprisingly strong demand for the thin margins. Instead of preparing for an increased truck demand, Cummins had diverted resources to its non-diesel holdings. To catch up to the competition, Cummins operated its factories 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and paid a large amount in overtime wages. A two-month long strike only exacerbated the company’s difficulties.

”We clearly left the door open to competitors,” Schacht told Forbes. Demand exceeded supply, and customers went elsewhere. There was criticism that Cummins met the demands of only its biggest customers and that smaller consumers were forced to buy from the competition. Cummins’ share of the large truck market reached a low point of less than 40% in the early 1970’s. The company elected to sell its other holdings and concentrate on meeting the unexpectedly high diesel demand.

The main challenge was to devise a marketing strategy for engines that remained about five per cent more expensive than the competition’s. The company refused to downgrade its product line. Management believed that the most significant problem for truckers who drove their vehicles 240,000 miles and more a year was downtime. So the company’s response to its slipping market share was to make its engines more powerful, which in turn made them more reliable. In this way Cummins held on to its largest customers.

Furthermore, the company expanded its overseas operations. It had a worldwide network of 3,000 service outlets, and a computerized analysis of 50,000 miles of major highways, allowing it to match the best engine to the customer’s requirements. Its reputation helped it gain access to new markets. By the mid-1970’s, 25% of the company’s revenues came from overseas, and additional profits were being made in the agriculture, construction, and marine enterprises for which Cummins was designing extra-large motors of 1,200 horsepower.

Then Cummins made an apparent mistake and introduced a line of 450-horsepower engines. This was 50% more power than a truck needed to haul a loaded rig at 65 mph on a level highway. Cummins was marketing power in its engines, but the problem was the new 55 mph speed limit. The company confronted this issue with an advertising campaign that stressed “reserve power.” According to the ads, the new engines could easily maintain 55 mph even on uphill grades, so truckers would not have to lose more speed than they had to by law. Furthermore, constant speed and less shifting would actually increase fuel efficiency.

The new engines didn’t sell very well at first, as the truck market in 1975 slumped 40%. The following year, however, the market rebounded, and Cummins took the lion’s share. Sales reached $1 billion and earnings were $59 million. Cummins benefited from the erratic enforcement of the 55 mph speed limit. Furthermore, the company outperformed its competitors by introducing a turbo-charged, slower-running version of its large-block engine, offering five per cent better economy.

Nonetheless, management was increasingly concerned about the volatile truck market. While automating company plants in order to stay competitive within the truck engine industry, Cummins increased its profit from non-highway engines until they accounted for nearly 25% of revenues. This stabilized the company. The demand for agricultural and construction equipment ran in cycles that were unrelated to the demand for truck engines. Cummins also established plants in Scotland, England, and France to penetrate the European market while avoiding European tariffs. It faced new rivals, such as Renault in France and Iveco in Italy, which placed only their own engines in trucks they were manufacturing. But Cummins, which had faced a similar obstacle in the 1930’s, was undeterred. New laws allowing trucks of up to 38,000 pounds on European highways, in addition to the escalating costs of fuel, persuaded the Cummins management that Europe was the new market for Cummins’ diesel engines. For Cummins, the European market grew slowly but steadily.

While planning to enter markets outside North America and Europe the Schacht management team also launched an austerity program. About 2,000 employees at the Columbus, Indiana, plant were laid off. Interest payments were cut sharply, and the debt-equity ratio reduced to 0.5 tol.

Looking to the future, Cummins agreed to a $350 million joint venture with the J. I. Case Co. in the early 1980’s to produce a new line of fuel efficient 3, 4, and 6-cylinder engines with a range of 55 to 250 horsepower. The engines, it was hoped, would reach the crucial middle-size truck market. At the same time, Cummins initiated a $750 million program to protect its share of the heavy-duty truck market. By 1984 Cummins surpassed a 60% share of that market once again. The next year, however, sales decreased.

In 1986 the company, confronting a soft truck market and declining profits, began to consolidate its worldwide operations and reduce its work force by 17%. It planned to close four plants, reducing its worldwide engine manufacturing and distribution floor space by 19%. While sales remained strong, new models such as the L-10 were not successfully entering the market. That and the cost of consolidation were leading the company into financial difficulty.

Principal Subsidiaries

Cummins Americas, Inc.; Cummins Corp.; Atlas Crankshaft Corp.; Fleetguard, Inc.; McCord Heat Transfer Corp.; HSE Consultants, Inc.; VI Holdings, Inc.; Diesel Recon, Inc.; Cummins Engine Holding, Co.; Advance Drivetrain Corp.; and Diesel Controls Technology, Inc. The company also has subsidiaries in the following countries: Australia, Barbados, Brazil, Britain, Canada, Colombia, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, N. Antilles, and Singapore.